Angelina Jolie wrote an Op-Ed about her recent trip to Iraq for today's Washington Post. While I usually do not question those who have won an Oscar and have procreated the offspring of Brad Pitt, I'm a little concerned. My Deity wrote the following:
Today's humanitarian crisis in Iraq -- and the potential consequences for our national security -- are great. Can the United States afford to gamble that 4 million or more poor and displaced people, in the heart of Middle East, won't explode in violent desperation, sending the whole region into further disorder?
What we cannot afford, in my view, is to squander the progress that has been made. In fact, we should step up our financial and material assistance. UNHCR has appealed for $261 million this year to provide for refugees and internally displaced persons. That is not a small amount of money -- but it is less than the U.S. spends each day to fight the war in Iraq. I would like to call on each of the presidential candidates and congressional leaders to announce a comprehensive refugee plan with a specific timeline and budget as part of their Iraq strategy.
As for the question of whether the surge is working, I can only state what I witnessed: U.N. staff and those of non-governmental organizations seem to feel they have the right set of circumstances to attempt to scale up their programs. And when I asked the troops if they wanted to go home as soon as possible, they said that they miss home but feel invested in Iraq. They have lost many friends and want to be a part of the humanitarian progress they now feel is possible.
I try not to be "blindly liberal", but I'm okay with being cynical and for that reason I am going to have to disagree with Angelina Jolie (something I really never wanted to do). Anyone with a brain cell can recognize the merits of staying in Iraq and PRAYING for a morsel of progress, however I am unconvinced that a new president could just miraculously bring progress to Iraq. Call me pessimistic, but I strongly believe continued military intervention in Iraq will worsen conditions ten-fold.
Angelina called this situation a "gamble". That way I look at it, the past has been a gamble and to say we've profited would be a blatant lie (the pronoun "we" does not include Haliburton). In fact, we are yet to obtain a winning hand. We're running out of things to gamble with, and we've subconsciously sacrificed the greatest asset of them all: our dignity. We need to go out the back door of the casino and head over to the nearest Gamblers Anonymous --- we may even be past help.
While I'm glad the soldiers currently residing in Iraq are positive and jovial, I think that is only half the battle (pun intended!). The Iraqis don't want us there! The proverbial gigs up! We need to learn how to take social cues and PEACE OUT (while this pun was more obscure, it was still intended).



